Download Affirmative Action in Medicine: Improving Health Care for by James L. Curtis PDF

By James L. Curtis

Affirmative motion courses have considerably replaced American drugs for the higher, not just in scientific college admissions and entry to postgraduate education but in addition in bringing the next caliber of healthiness care to everybody. James L. Curtis methods this crucial transition from old, statistical, and private views. He tells how over the process his clinical schooling and profession as a psychiatrist and professor--often because the first or in basic terms African American in his cohort--the prestige of minorities within the clinical professions grew from a tiny percent to a much more equitable illustration of the yank inhabitants. Advancing arguments from his previous booklet, Blacks, scientific colleges, and Society, Curtis evaluates the results of affirmative motion efforts during the last thirty years. He describes ambitious obstacles to minority entry to medical-education possibilities and the ensuing difficulties confronted by way of minority sufferers in receiving clinical remedy. His growth file features a evaluation of 2 thousand minority scholars admitted to U.S. scientific faculties in 1969, following them via commencement and their careers, evaluating them with the careers of 2 thousand in their nonminority friends. those samples supply an enormous examine scientific colleges that, whereas heralding dramatic development in healthcare professional schooling and coaching chance, shows a lot room for extra development. A uncomplicated hurdle maintains to stand African americans and different minorities who're nonetheless limited to segregated neighborhoods and inferior institution structures that stifle complete scholastic improvement. Curtis urges us as a kingdom to enhance all our human assets via a diffusion of affirmative motion courses, therefore enhancing future health take care of every body. James L. Curtis is medical Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry, Columbia collage university of Physicians and Surgeons.

Show description

Read or Download Affirmative Action in Medicine: Improving Health Care for Everyone PDF

Best health policy books

A Guide to Starting your own Complementary Therapy Practice

This step by step consultant on constructing personal complementary healthiness care perform, covers each point of beginning a brand new perform, taking into consideration the big variety of perform requisites from the extremely simple (e. g. in therapist's own residence) to the extra formidable (e. g. procuring premises from which to establish a clinic).

Evidence-based Practice in Medicine and Health Care: A Discussion of the Ethical Issues

Evidence-based drugs (EBM) is feared to develop into a type of cook-book drugs that has not anything to do with the conventional talents and ethics. This quantity exhibits the contribution EBM makes and may make to scientific perform and overall healthiness coverage. It describes as many viewpoints as attainable with a spotlight at the moral concerns which are at stake during this procedure.

Lead Wars: The Politics of Science and the Fate of America's Children

During this incisive exam of lead poisoning in the past part century, Gerald Markowitz and David Rosner specialize in some of the most contentious and sour battles within the background of public health and wellbeing. Lead Wars information how the character of the epidemic has replaced and highlights the dilemmas public well-being organizations face this present day when it comes to prevention recommendations and persistent disease associated with low degrees of poisonous publicity.

Health Care Politics, Policy and Services: A Social Justice Analysis

This new version of the AJN Award-winning textbook analyzes the most up-tp-date well-being care reforms and their impression on our healthiness method from a social justice point of view. It addresses the reforms of the landmark well-being care reform invoice handed in March, 2010, and gives scholars of health and wellbeing care coverage with a framework in which they could comprehend and evaluation our wellbeing and fitness process.

Additional resources for Affirmative Action in Medicine: Improving Health Care for Everyone

Sample text

His second application to the University of California (Davis) was thought to be unsuccessful because he made a poor interview impression, and from my experience on an admission committee I would surmise also that his age and his second choice of medicine were factors against him. He claimed that because UC Davis set 22 Affirmative Action in Medicine aside 16 of its 100 places in the entering class for minority students that he had suffered illegal racial discrimination since his grade point average and scores were higher than those of minority students admitted under a quota plan.

0 percent. S. 1 percent of first-year places. S. medical students that year (Gordon and Johnson 1977). 2 percent of all unsuccessful applicants. In that sense New York was simultaneously the biggest winner and the biggest loser, by the sheer weight of its proportion of the applicant pool. 5 percent of all unsuccessful applicants. S. medical students, demonstrating a smaller contribution compared to New York. Both states, however, exported more firstyear students to other states than they accommodated in total enrollment capacity.

In order to constitute a class of 101 students, about 180 acceptances were offered. But two minority students had to be accepted to obtain one enrollment, since the “best” minority students are fewer in number. Students who were accepted at Cornell ordinarily had been accepted by most of the other medical schools to which they applied. Medical schools therefore compete for the “best” applicants, making admissions decisions a two-way process involving both the applicant and the school. s. medical schools 27 Some factors have little direct relationship to personal attributes of an applicant but great bearing on whether he or she will be chosen as a member of that class.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.05 of 5 – based on 23 votes