Download Crescas' Critique of Aristotle: Problems of Aristotle's by Harry Austryn Wolfson PDF

By Harry Austryn Wolfson

"Text and translation of the twenty-five porpositions of publication 1 of the Or Adonal": p. [129]-315.

Show description

Read Online or Download Crescas' Critique of Aristotle: Problems of Aristotle's Physics in Jewish and Arabic Philosophy (Harvard Semitic Series) PDF

Similar ethnic studies books

Theorizing Anti-racism: Linkages in Marxism and Critical Race Theories

Over the past few many years, serious idea which examines problems with race and racism has flourished. even if, so much of this paintings falls on one part or the opposite of a theoretical divide among concept encouraged via Marxist methods to race and racism and that encouraged by way of postcolonial and demanding race thought.

Art and Anger: Essays on Politics and the Imagination

Ilan Stavans's large and sophisticated wisdom deftly emerges during this engrossing number of essays. eager about the belief of Western civilization as a chain of innumerable misinterpretations and misrepresentations, Stavans covers in those nineteen items a extensive diversity of private and philosophical issues with the unifying subject matter being the crossroads the place politics and the mind's eye meet.

Extra info for Crescas' Critique of Aristotle: Problems of Aristotle's Physics in Jewish and Arabic Philosophy (Harvard Semitic Series)

Sample text

Cf. Graetz, Gesclli&lale dM hulen, Vol. Vlll, Note 2. '' 0. , nnv. This is the correct reoldiDg according to the Munach, Pans, V1enna and New 18 CRESCAS' CRITIQUE OF ARISTOTLE ters in Book IV bear the unmistakable internal evidence of having been written originally as a sort of preliminary studies to problems dealt with in earlier parts of the work. Thus the discussion as to "whether there is only one world or whether there are many worlds at the same time" in IV, 2, seems to have been written as precursory to the same problem dealt with at the end of Prop.

177), n. 160. I cr. Prop. I, Part II (p. 191), n. 40. •Ibitl. (p. 195), n. 49. , (p. '" In fine, if an infinite exists, it must not be conceived in any of the tPrms by which a finite object is described. •• Quite the contrary it can be either composite or simple. In the first place, the infinite may well be a composite body, consisting of an infinite number of elements. To be sure, Aristotle has rejected the possibility of an infinite number of elements. But his rejection is based upon an assumption that the elements must be known whereas an infinite number cannot be known.

Prop. I, Part II (p. 193), n. 45. This would seem to be the point of Crescas' argument in that passage. ''Ibid. (p. 193), n. 46. ' 1 Prop. I, Part I (p. 151), n. 64. " Prop. I, Part II (p. 195), n. 48. •• Prop. [, Part [ (p. 153). n. 68. 44 CRESCAS' CRITIQUE OJ' ARISTOTLE the object existing in place must be finite. In restating the second part of Aristotle's argument, Averroes introduces Aristotle's formal definition of place and makes the entire argument hinge upon that definition. Similarly Abraham ibn Daud advances an argument against the existence of an infinite based upon Aristotle's formal definition of place.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.20 of 5 – based on 9 votes